Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Sex And Church Essays - Interpersonal Relationships,
  Sex And Church    A major misconception that many people have is what they think the church's  opinion is on sexual intercourse. Most people believe that the church thinks sex  is a sinful act that should only be done in privacy for procreation reason and  should never be discussed about in public. This belief though is incorrect  because the church since the beginning of time has believed that sex is a God  given gift. Recently a problem though has occurred in which people have been  arrested for either promoting sexual intercourse or participating in the act.    Two recent court cases that have dealt with the concept of sex being unmoral is    Griswold versus Connecticut and Bowers versus Hardwick. Both of these cases  brought up new questions about whether different kinds of sex are moral or not.    The first case was Griswold versus Connecticut. This case was about Estelle    Griswold who opened a birth control clinic in 1961 in Connecticut. This clinic  was made with the belief that they would soon be caught breaking one of the many    Connecticut sex laws. Three days after it opened Griswold was arrested after  giving birth control to a married couple. The other case was Bowers versus    Hardwick. This case involved a man named Michael Hardwick who was caught by a  police officer having anal sex with another man in his own home. There is law in    Georgia that states that anal sex is illegal so Hardwick was immediately  arrested. Whether or not the Church would agree with these court cases is a  difficult question to answer. The churches opinion on sex has changed throughout  history. In the begin the Church believed that sex should only occur if a  married couple wishes to have a child but the modern church has a new opinion.    The modern church believes sex should be for pleasure not just procreation as  long though as the couple having sex is loyal to each other. The modern church  agrees with people having sex as long as the two people are in love with each  other. This means that the church would agree with Griswold versus Connecticut  because the birth control was given to a married couple. If two people are  married that means they care for each other and it is not just meaningless sex.    If the birth control was given to people who did not care about each other then  the Church would disagree. In the Bower's versus Hardwick case one question  would have to be asked before the church could makes its discussion. The  question would be whether or not Hardwick and the man he was having sex with  were in love. If the men did care about each other then by the teachings of the  modern church the sex would be allowed. Even though the Church does not agree  with homosexuality it would have to disagree with arresting of this young man.    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.